TL;DR: Studio is a simulation lab studying how humans and societies interact with new ideas, and building the first software models that can accurately predict that response. Instead of creating digital twins of survey respondents, Studio builds live market models of interconnected consumer segments from real behavior data. Studio's predictions match live KPI outcomes like revenue and sentiment with over 95% accuracy.
A huge number of consequential decisions are bets on human behavior.
A company launches a product or changes a price. A brand runs a campaign. A public institution launches a new initiative or communications strategy. In each case, the outcome depends on how a population responds.
Today, teams rely on surveys and historical data to help derisk those bets.
But those tools are inherently outdated and non-comprehensive: they observe people individually and at a point in time.
Real populations don’t behave that way.
People influence one another. Reactions spread between groups. Adoption compounds or fades. Sentiment changes. A decision that resonates with one audience can change how another audience responds. Those interactions are what ultimately determine outcomes like revenue, conversion, adoption, and sentiment.
Currently, the only real “simulation” is the launch itself.
Studio builds live models of a company’s market from real data on how consumers behave. It overlays internal data like sales and campaign performance with external evidence like social conversations and market trends.
Studio uses those signals to construct highly specific audience cohorts and model how their behavior and influence interact over time.
Teams can then:
Instead of predicting “How will this person respond to X?”, Studio answers:
“How will a population interact with X, and why?”
Studio has live-tested with large consumer brands like Danone and Mila, and our model’s predictions match real-world KPI outcomes with >95% accuracy.
We’ve spent years predicting behavior. Nikita built simulation software to understand and predict individual decision-making at MIT, while Cameron built predictive models for financial institutions and in private equity, and agent-based society simulations at UC Berkeley MET.
We met at the same gap: you can simulate how a protein will fold or how a financial system will react to a market shock, but there is no equivalent for simulating how society will interact with a new idea. We’re now creating a studio to design society.
We’re initially working with enterprises making high-stakes audience-facing decisions across product, pricing, innovation, brand, marketing, and communications.
But the underlying problem is much broader.
Any organization trying to create a particular response in a population should be able to test different versions of that decision, understand how reactions might spread, and compare likely outcomes before deploying it.
We’d love to talk to teams making consumer-facing decisions. This could be a new product, pricing plan, campaign, etc.
If you have an upcoming decision you’d like to test before it goes live, we’d love to run it through Studio!
trystudio.ai
team@trystudio.ai
Let’s chat: https://cal.com/team/trystudio/quick-chat